One of the intriguing questions considered by anthropologists concerns the purpose our early ancestors had in first creating images of the world around them. █████ █████ ██████ ███ ███████████████ ████ █████████ ████ ██ ███ █████████████ █ ██████ ███ ██████████ ███ ████████████ ██ ██████ ███ ███ ████████ ███ ████████ █████ ████████ ██ ████████████████ ████ ███
Phenomenon ·Aurignacian cave paintings
Question: What was the purpose of the cave paintings?
OP Hypothesis 1 ·It was art; it was luxury meant for enjoyment
Evidence: paintings are astonishingly well-executed; suggests creators were professional artists; suggests that Aurignacian culture was wealthy enough to support an artistic class.
Argument for Hypothesis 2 ·Superstitious beliefs were common; paintings outline vital organs in red; evidence of ceremonies around the paintings
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
1.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████████ ████████ █████████ ███ ██████ ██████████ ██ ███████████████ ██ ███ █████ ██████████
Question Type
Author’s attitude
Implied
The anthropologists in P3 hypothesize that the paintings were at least partially intended to grant power over the Aurignacians’ prey. There’s evidence the author agrees with this hypothesis. Notice that she claims that the explanation is “supported” by various features of the paintings.
a
implicit acceptance
This is the best answer. As explained below the question stem, the author claims that various features of the paintings “support” the anthropologists’ explanation. This is evidence of unstated agreement with that explanation.
b
hesitant agreement
There’s no evidence the author is “hesitant” about her agreement. We don’t get any expression of doubt concerning the anthropologists’ explanation in P3.
c
noncommittal curiosity
The author claims that various features of the paintings “support” the anthropologists’ explanation. This goes beyond mere “curiosity” — there’s evidence the author agrees with the explanation.
d
detached skepticism
There’s no evidence the author is skeptical of the anthropologists’ explanation. She never expresses doubt or raises potential counterevidence.
e
broad disagreement
There’s no evidence the author disagrees with the anthropologists’ explanation. She never expresses doubt or raises potential counterevidence.
Difficulty
87% of people who answer get this correct
This is a slightly challenging question.
It is slightly harder than the average question in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%120
135
75%150
Analysis
Author’s attitude
Implied
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
87%
164
b
3%
156
c
9%
160
d
1%
155
e
1%
156
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.