Conclusion This stamp is probably highly valuable, since Support it exhibits a printing error. ███ ████ █████████ ███████ ██ ███████████ █ ███████ ██████ ████████ ██ ██ ██ ████ ██████████ ███ ███ ██████ ███ ████ ████ ██ ███████ █ ████ █████████ ███ ██ ██ █████ ███ ██ █████
This stamp’s likely highly valuable. Why? It exhibits a printing error, is in good shape, and is quite old, and the most important factors affecting a stamp’s value, assuming it’s in good condition, are its rarity and age.
The conclusion is that the stamp is probably highly valuable. According to the premises, we know, assuming that it’s in good condition, a stamp’s value is largely determined by its rarity and age. The stamp in the stimulus is old, but the argument doesn’t outright state that it’s rare. We can infer the argument’s conclusion if we assume that a stamp having a printing error is a rare trait.
The conclusion is properly inferred ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
The older a █████ ███ ███ ████ ████████ ██ ███
Printing errors are ██████ ████████ ██ █ ███ ██████████ ███████
Most stamps with ████████ ██████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ███████████
Rarity and age ███ ██ █████ ██████████ ██ █ ███████ ██████
Even old and ████ ██████ ███ ███████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ███ ██ ████ ██████████