Conclusion Carl is clearly an incompetent detective. ██ ███ ██████ █ ███████ ██████████ ██ ███ █████ ████████ ██ ███ ██ ███ ████ █ ████████████ █ ███ ██ █████████ ███ █████ █████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██████
The author concludes that Carl is an incompetent detective. This is because Carl has solved a smaller percentage of his cases than any other detective in the police force.
The author assumes that competence is determined by what proportion of cases any given detective has solved relative to what proportion of cases their peers have solved. She also assumes that the case Carl solved didn’t involve significantly more work or more difficult work than the cases his peers solved, which would call into the question the idea of his “incompetence.”
Which one of the following, ██ █████ ████ █████████ ███████ ███ ████████ ██████
Because the police █████ ███████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ███████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ███ ████ ███ ████ █████████ ██████ ████ ████ ██████ ████ ██████ ██ ██████
Before he became █ ██████████ ████ ███ █ ████████████ ██████ ███████ ███ ███ ██████ █████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ████████████ ██ ██████████
Detectives on the ██████ █████ ██ █████ ████ ██████ ███ ████████ ████ █████████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ███ ██ █ █████ ████████ █████████ ██ ████ ████ █████ ███████
Carl was previously █ █████████ ██ █ ██████ ██████████ ██ ███████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █ █████ ██ █████ ██████ ██ ██████ ████ █ ███ ██ ██ ███████
Many of the ████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██████████ ██ █████ ████ ██████ ████ █████ ██ ████████ ██████ ███ ████ █ ██████