(A) encapsulates the mismatch between the evidence and the conclusion. We know there is an increased risk of heart attacks for binge drinkers, but because binge drinkers and daily drinkers are different groups, we don’t anything about the risk of heart attacks for daily drinkers.

This is descriptively inaccurate. The heath risks aren’t confused; the critics reference the risk of alcohol-induced heart attacks in an attempt to demonstrate the negative net effect of consuming 3+ glasses daily.

The critics’ argument says that binge drinkers are those most likely to drink three glasses of wine in one day. Their argument isn’t about other alcoholic beverages.

This answer is descriptively inaccurate. The argument does acknowledge the reduction in the risk of stroke that comes with drinking three glasses of wine daily; the critics just think that the reduction in stroke risk is outweighed by the increased risk of heart attacks.

While the argument does overlook this difference, this difference is not relevant to the argument. Drinking three glasses of wine per day decreases the risk of stroke––it doesn’t matter how severe the strokes are. The argument is concerned with stroke risk, not stroke severity.