Glen: An emphasis on law's purely procedural side produces a concern with personal rights that leads to the individual's indifference to society's welfare. █████ ███████ ████ ██████ ██ ██ ██████ ████████ █████████
█████ ███ ████ █ ████ █████ █████████ ██████████ ██ ██████ █████ █████ ██ ████ ███ █████ █████████ ████ █████ ██ ████ █████████ ████ ████████████ █████ ██████████████ ██ ████████████ ███████
Glen argues that the primary role of the law should be to create virtuous citizens. Why? Because focusing on the procedural aspect of law puts too much emphasis on individuals rather than overall societal welfare. (Glen appears to assume that the options are either a procedural focus or a focus on creating virtuous citizens.)
Sarah implies the conclusion that the law’s primary focus should not be on creating virtuous citizens. Why? Because that focus would encourage the government to decide what counts as “virtuous,” which Sarah says is a worse alternative than caring too much about individuals. In other words, Sarah thinks that Glen’s conclusion would lead to a worse outcome than the issue Glen wants to solve.
We need to find a disagreement. Glen and Sarah disagree about whether the law’s primary role should be creating virtuous citizens.
The dialogue provides the most ███████ ███ ███ █████ ████ ████ ███ ████ ████████ █████ ███████
citizens can be ███████ ██ ██ ███████ ██ ██████ ████ ███████ ███████ ████████████ ████████████
virtuousness on the ████ ██ ████████ ██ ████ █████████ ████ ███ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██████
there is an ████████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██████████ ██ ██████ ████ ███████████ ████████ ████████ █████ ████████
an emphasis on █████ ██████ ██████████ ████ ███████ ██ ████████████ █████ ██████████████ ██ █████████ ██████
the cultivation of ██████ █████ ████████ ██████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ██ ███