Chinh: Conclusion Television producers should not pay attention to the preferences of the viewing public when making creative decisions. █████ ████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ ███ ████████████ ██████ █████ ██ ████
█████ ███ ██████████ ██ █████████ ███ ███ ███████ ███████ ██ █ ████████ ██ ████ ████ █ ███ ████ ████ ██ ███████ ████ ██ █ ███████ █████ ██ █████████ ███ ██ ████████ ██████████ ██████ ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ██ ████████ ████ ████████ ████████ ████████████
Chinh concludes that viewers’ preferences shouldn’t be a factor in TV producers’ creative decisions. As support, Chinh uses an analogy: great painters don’t think about the desires of museum attendees.
As Lana says, Chinh uses an analogy that isn’t analogous enough. Chinh compares the relationship between TV producers and the viewing public with the relationship between great painters and the museum-going public, but the comparison falls short. TV producers may be more directly influenced by audience preferences than painters are by museum visitors.
According to Lana, Chinh's argument ██ ██████ ██ ████ ██
is circular
relies on a ██████ ██ █████████ ████ ██ ████████████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███████
infers from the ██████ ████████ ██ ██ ██████ ████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ ███████ ████ ██████
fails to consider ███ ███████████ ████ ████████ ███ ██ ████ ███ ██ ██████ ███ ████████████ ██████
offers a faulty ███████