PT128.S2.Q9 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2

Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27 Question 28

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

PASSAGE 3

Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

The author concludes that voting by mail shouldn’t be allowed and the proposed amendment should be rejected. As support, the author says that voting has always been done in person.

The author is just making an appeal to tradition––he doesn’t provide any support for his conclusion besides “we’ve always done it this way.”

The argument does not assume that, if voting rights are violated, then voting was conducted by mail. This is descriptively inaccurate.

The argument is about what should happen, not about what will happen.

This is the flaw. The only support for the author’s conclusion is “we’ve always done it this way.” The only reason provided to reject the proposal is the appeal to tradition.

The argument does fail to consider this possibility, but this possibility isn’t relevant to the argument. The author’s argument is that voting by mail should not even be allowed; it is irrelevant to consider that it might never be required.

This is descriptively inaccurate. The premises do not contradict the conclusion.

PrepTest 128 - Section 2 - Question 9

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action