This is anti-supported. The columnist sees the importance of looking at other factors when determining one’s morality.

This is too strong to support. The stimulus does not mention what is fair/unfair, only that people are judged for things outside of their intentions

This is anti-supported. The stimulus suggests that people are judged differently in different situations.

The example with the cook mirrors this answer choice. Whether one is allergic to an ingredient (outside of the cook’s control) is a major factor in how they are morally judged.

This is too strong to support. The columnist suggests that there are factors other than one’s motives, not that their intentions are “rarely a decisive factor.”