Self-study
P1
The United States government agency responsible for overseeing television and radio broadcasting, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), had an early history of addressing only the concerns of parties with an economic interest in broadcasting—chiefly broadcasting companies. ███
Intro topic ·
FCC and its stakeholders
FCC's perspective ·
Saw itself as responsible only for the concerns of broadcasters
Because broadcasters have an economic stake in broadcasting, whereas members of the general public do not
P2
█ ████████ ████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████ ████████ ██ █████ █ █████ ██████████ ███████ ██ ████████ ███████████ ███ ████████ ███ █ ███████ ██ ███ ████████████ ████████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ ███████ ████████████ █████████ ███████ ████████ ███████████ ██████████ ███ ███ ███ █ ███████ █████ ███ ████████████ ████████ ██ ████ ████████ ███ ██████ ███████ ████ ███ ███████ █████████ ██████ ███████████ ██ ███ █████ ██ █████████ ████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ████████████ ███████ ████ ███ ██████ ██████ ███ █████ ██ ████████ ████████ ████████ ███ █ ████████ ███ ███ ████████ ███ █████████ ██████ ██ █████████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ ████ █ ███████████ ████████████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████ ████████ ███ ███ ███████ ████ █████ ██ ████████ ███ ████████ ███████████ ████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ███ █████████████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████████ ███
Spotlight important development ·
Church opposed renewal of local station's broadcasting license
FCC rejected the church's request for a hearing on the grounds that (1) the church did not have an economic stake in the situation and (2) the FCC already agreed with the church's concerns
Criticize FCC ·
Its behavior was inconsistent with its rationale
Author's perspective ·
FCC's real rationale
FCC wanted to prevent community interest groups from influencing the broadcasting decisions of government and industry
P3
███ ██████ ████████ ███ █████ ████████ ██ ██████ ███ ██ ████ ███ ███████ ███ █████ ██ █ ██████ ███████ ██ ███ █████████ ███████ ███ █ █████████ ████████ ███ ███████ ███ ██ ██████ ██████ ███ ███ █████████ ████ ██ ███ ██████ █████ ███ ███████ █ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████ ███ ██████ ████████ ██████ ███ ████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ███ █████████████ ████ ██ ████████ ███ █████████ ███████ ███████ ██████ ██ ███ ████ ██████ ████ ███ ██████ ███████ ████ ██████████ █ ██████ ███████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████████ ████ ██ █████ ██████ ██ ████████ ███ █████ ██ █████████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ █████████ ████████████ ████████
Next important development ·
Multiple appeals by church led to court ruling in their favor
Court revoked station's license, ruled that public concerns are a legitimate reason for challenging FCC decisions
P4
███ ████ ███████████ █ ██████████ █████████ ███ ███████ ██ ██ ███ ██████ ███ █████ ██ █████████████ ██████████ ███████ ████ █████████ ███ █████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ ███ ███████████ ██ █████ ███ ██████████ █████████ ██████ ███ ███ ██ ███████ ████ █████ █████ ██████
Main point ·
Chuch's appeals created important legal precedent
Requires public concerns to be heard by FCC
Passage Style
Single position
Spotlight
2.
The author mentions some additional ██████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ █
a
support the author's █████ ████ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ████ ██ ██ ███ ██████ ███ █████ ██ ████████████
This best captures the purpose, which is to present examples of ways in which the world of broadcasting has opened to the public.
b
suggest the level ██ █████████ ████ █████████ ██████ ████ ████████ ████ ██████ ██ ████████████
The author never suggests that people need to be vigilant about broadcasters. Being careful isn’t a concept raised on the passage.
c
provide an explanation ██ ███ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ ██ ████████ ███ ███████████ ██ ████████████ ██ ████ █ ████████ █████
The author doesn’t indicate that we’re allowed to question broadcasters on a “frequent” basis. In addition, the purpose isn’t to explain why we can provide public input; it’s to provide examples of topics on which we are allowed to provide public input.
d
illustrate other areas ██ ██████████ ████ █████ ███ ███████ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ███ ███████
The author doesn’t indicate that the station mentioned in the first three paragraphs was accused of other misconduct. The topics mentioned at the end are not necessarily related to the station.
e
demonstrate that the ███████ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ███ ███ ███ ████ ███ ██ ████ █████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ ██████
The purpose is to provide examples of topics on which the public can provide input. The purpose isn’t about showing other stations aren’t listening to the public.