An effort should be made to dispel the misunderstandings that still prevent the much-needed synthesis and mutual supplementation of science and the humanities. βββ
Problem Β·Misunderstandings prevent the synthesis of science and the humanities
The misunderstanding should be dispelled. Science and the humanities should be synthesized.
Author sees this as a "caricature" of science. Author implies that science does not ignore or explain away the most essential human values. That science can have something to say about morality, religion, and the arts.
Scientists (mistakenly) view humanities as only interested in emotion and sentiment. That humanities are useless because it serves no pragmatic purpose (contra science and technology). That morality, religion, and the arts are of secondary importance.
Possible and even probably if focus is on common objectives (understanding people and the world).
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Problem-analysis
7.
Which one of the following βββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββββββ ββ ββ βββββββ ββ β ββββββββββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββ β βββββββββ
Question Type
Authorβs perspective
Implied
The author describes the misunderstandings of science held by a humanist mainly in P2. One misunderstanding is that scientists are interested only in mathematical, physical, and chemical laws of the world. Another misunderstanding is that science ignores or explains away human values. The answer might also come from P4, where the author corrects misconceptions each side has of the other.
a
Science encourages the ββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββββββββ
We donβt have evidence humanists think science believes emotions canβt be explained. Rather, humanists think science tries to βignore or explain away human values.β Itβs not clear that βhuman valuesβ relate to emotion. But in any case, we simply donβt know what humanists think science believes about the explainability of science. If anything, humanists are the ones who think emotions canβt be explained.
We have no evidence humanists believe science arises from practical needs and serves other needs, too. This is too positive about science; it wouldnβt make sense for the author to describe humanists as holding this belief.
Supported as a misconception of science held by humanists. When the author says that science βin factβ does not depend only on measurable data, sheβs telling the humanists that theyβre wrong in thinking science depends only on measurable data.
This isnβt something the author indicates humanists think. Itβs also not something the author would consider wrong. So the author wouldnβt view (E) as a misconception.
Difficulty
83% of people who answer get this correct
This is a slightly challenging question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%120
137
75%155
Analysis
Authorβs perspective
Implied
Critique or debate
Humanities
Problem-analysis
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
11%
161
b
0%
157
c
83%
165
d
4%
160
e
1%
160
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then youβre free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then youβre free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.