Editorial: Almost every year the Smithfield River floods the coastal fishing community of Redhook, which annually spends $3 million on the cleanup. ββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββ βββββ βββββ ββββ ββ βββββββ βββ βββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββββββ β βββ βββββ βββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββ ββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββ βββββ βββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββ ββ βββββ ββββ βββββ ββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββ βββββββββ
The editorial argues that the proposal to dam the river is misguided. Building the dam would have negative consequences. The dam would prevent the flow of nutrients, causing fish to feed elsewhere. The loss of the fish would cost $10 million annually (which is much more than the cost of the cleanup from flooding that the dam was built to prevent).
The conclusion is the editorialβs refutation of the residents who propose damming the river: βtheir position is misguided.β
Analysis by AlbertGauthier
Which one of the following ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ
The Smithfield River ββββββ ββ ββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββββββ
Nutrients from the ββββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββ βββββββββββ
Damming the Smithfield βββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββ β ββββββββ
For Redhook to βββββ β βββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββββ ββ β ββββββββ
The Smithfield River ββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββ βββββ