Landscape architect: Support If the screen between these two areas is to be a hedge, that hedge must be of either hemlocks or Leyland cypress trees. ████████ ███████ ███████ █████ ██████ ██ █████ ████ ███ ██████ ██ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ██ ██ █ ██████ ██ ████ ██ █ ███████ ██████
The argument proceeds by eliminating one of two possible options. Only hemlocks or Leyland cypress trees could be used for this particular hedge screen. Since Leyland trees can’t grow where the hedge would be put in, the architect rules them out. That leaves hemlocks as the only option. The architect concludes that, if a hedge is to be grown here, it will have to be composed of hemlocks.
In which one of the █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ █████████ ████ ███████ ██ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████ █████████
If there is ██ ██ ██ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████ ████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ █ █████ ████████ █ ████ █████ ██████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██ █████ ████ ██ ██ ████████ ██ ███ █████ █████
Mismatched premises and conclusion. This only describes one option, but ultimately rules it out, leading to the conclusion that there’s no good option. The stimulus, however, eliminates one of two options.
If visitors are ██ ██████ ██ ████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ███████████ █████ ████ ██ █ ████ ███ ███████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██████ ███ ███████ ███ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ██ ████████ ███ ██████ ██ ████ ██ ███████████ ███ ██████ ████ ██ ████████
Mismatched premises and conclusion. This presents only one option, and the conclusion is a prediction about the future. The stimulus presents two options and has a conditional conclusion rather than a concrete future prediction.
The subsoil in █████ ████ █████ ██████ ████████ ████████ ██ ████ ██ ████████ ████████ ██ ██████ ██████████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ███████ ██████ ██ ████ ██ █████ ████ ███ ██████ ████ █████ ███ █ █████ ████████
Mismatched premises and conclusion. This presents two options, but fails to eliminate either of them. The stimulus eliminates one of the two options it presents.
Any path along ████ ██████████ ████ ██ ██████ ████████ ██ ██████ ███ █ ████████ ████ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ████ █████████ ██ ██ █████ ██ ██ ██ █ ████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ ████ ██ █ █████ █████
This argument proceeds by eliminating one of two possible options. The path could only be made of concrete or stone, but concrete won’t work. This leaves stone as the only remaining option for the path’s material.
A space the ████ ██ ████ ██████ █████ ██ ████████ ███ █ ██████████ ██ █ ██████ █████ ████████ █ ██████████ █████ ██ █████ ███ █ ██████ ████ █████ ██████ ███████ ██ ██ ████ ██ ████ ███ ███ ████ ██ ██████ █ ███████
Mismatched premises and conclusion. This presents two options and attaches negative effects to both of them. The conclusion then makes a value judgment about what the best course of action would be. The stimulus, in contrast, eliminates one option and concludes that the other would have to be used.
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnosticWant to know why the right answer is right?
7Sage membership unlocks explanations of every question. Every answer choice. On every official PrepTest. Start with a free account.
By signing up you agree to our
terms of service.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.