Mismatched premises and conclusion. This only describes one option, but ultimately rules it out, leading to the conclusion that there’s no good option. The stimulus, however, eliminates one of two options.

Mismatched premises and conclusion. This presents only one option, and the conclusion is a prediction about the future. The stimulus presents two options and has a conditional conclusion rather than a concrete future prediction.

Mismatched premises and conclusion. This presents two options, but fails to eliminate either of them. The stimulus eliminates one of the two options it presents.

This argument proceeds by eliminating one of two possible options. The path could only be made of concrete or stone, but concrete won’t work. This leaves stone as the only remaining option for the path’s material.

Mismatched premises and conclusion. This presents two options and attaches negative effects to both of them. The conclusion then makes a value judgment about what the best course of action would be. The stimulus, in contrast, eliminates one option and concludes that the other would have to be used.