PT131.S2.Q3 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8

PASSAGE 2

Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15

PASSAGE 3

Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22

PASSAGE 4

Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

The author states that if a bank customer accidentally receives a large deposit of money, the bank will almost certainly detect the error, even though banks process a huge number of transactions. No evidence is provided for this claim.

Since banks double-check large transactions, they’re likely to catch an accidental large credit. This provides some evidence to support the author's claim.

As far as we know, customers aren’t involved in these accidental credits. So this doesn't explain how accidental deposits would be caught.

This doesn’t explain how those large accidental credits would be caught by the bank. If anything, this shifts responsibility to the customer to catch such mistakes.

Even if that ratio has increased, we don't know how effective these auditors used to be, or how much their efficacy has improved. This doesn't provide enough information to be supportive.

As far as we know, accidental credits to customer accounts have nothing to do with hackers. That makes information about hackers irrelevant.

PrepTest 131 - Section 2 - Question 3

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action