Waller: Conclusion If there were really such a thing as extrasensory perception, it would generally be accepted by the public since Support anyone with extrasensory powers would be able to convince the general public of its existence by clearly demonstrating those powers. ███████ ██████ ███ ███ ██████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████ █████ ███████ ██████ ███ ███████
█████ ████ ██████████ ██ ███████████ ████████ ██ ███ ████████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████ ██ ███ ████████ █████ ███████ █████████████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ ████████████ ███████████ ███ ███████ █████ ████████ ███ ████ ██████ ████████ ████ ██████ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ████ █████████
Waller argues that if ESP were real, it would be generally accepted by the public. This is because someone with ESP powers could demonstrate these powers convincingly enough to gain public acceptance, wealth, and renown.
Chin argues that it is impossible to demonstrate anything to the satisfaction of all skeptics. Thus, Chin believes that as long as the cultural elite is closed-minded to the possibility of ESP, media reports and public opinion will remain biased against it.
Disagree: Waller and Chin disagree that if ESP were real, it would be accepted by the general public.
Waller's and Chin's statements commit ████ ██ ███████████ ██ ███████
extrasensory perception is █ ████ ██████████
extrasensory perception, if ██ ████ █ ████ ███████████ █████ ██ ████████████ ██ ███ ████████████ ██ ███ ████████
skeptics about extrasensory ██████████ ████ █ ████ ████
the failure of ███ ███████ ██████ ██ ███████ ██ ████████████ ██████████ ██ ████ ████████ ███████ ███ █████████
the general public ████████ ████ ████████████ ██████████ ██ █ ████ ██████████