To date, Support most of the proposals that have been endorsed by the Citizens League have been passed by the city council. βββββ βββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββ βββββ
The author concludes that future proposals endorsed by the Citizens League will likely be passed at council. This is because in the past, most proposals endorsed by the Citizens League have been passed at council. To find a match for this method of reasoning, the first step is to abstract the argument. That will make it easier to identify which answer choice follows the same pattern.
In this case, the author is relying on an analogy between past and future events, saying that because a certain type of event has been likely to have a certain result in the past, that event will probably yield the same result in the future. So that's the pattern we're looking for: a statement that event A has usually led to result B in the past, supporting a conclusion that a future event will probably follow the same trend.
When looking at the answer choices, here are are two things to keep in mind. The first is that the order of the elements is less important; we want to focus on the actual logical relationship of those elements, whatever their order. The second is that although some answers will likely be easy to eliminate quickly, the choice between the final options often comes down to small details. That's why it's important to be very clear on the structure of the stimulus, so we can check that every part matches.
Analysis by AlexandraNash
The pattern of reasoning in βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββ
Most of the ββββββ ββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββββββββ βββββ ββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββ βββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββββββ
Most of the ββββββββββ βββββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ
Most of the βββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ βββ βββ βββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ βββββ βββββββ βββ ββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββ ββ βββββ ββ ββ βββββββ
Most of the βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ βββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββ
Most of the βββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ β ββββββββ βββββ