PT135.S1.Q15 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 4 · lr

The author concludes that the number of deaths per year would decrease by half if medicine could prevent all iatrogenic disease. This is based on the fact that as many people die of iatrogenic disease (deaths from medical treatments or hospitalization) as die of all other causes combined.

The author overlooks the possibility that if people didn’t die of iatrogenic disease, they might die of other causes (such as the illnesses that required them to be hospitalized or to undergo treatment). So even if we could prevent iatrogenic disease, the number of deaths per year would not go down by half.

The argument concerns what would happen if we could get rid of iatrogenic disease. It’s not clear what impact prevention of noniatrogenic disease has on the reasoning.

The author never assumed that no medical treatment could be replaced by less invasive/damaging alternatives. So pointing out that such replacements are possible doesn’t undermine the reasoning of the argument.

This possibility points out that the number of deaths per year would not necessarily decrease by half, even if iatrogenic disease were prevented. People who don’t die from hospitalization might instead die from something else.

The conclusion is conditioned on medicine finding ways of preventing iatrogenic disease. The conclusion doesn’t assume that this is possible. It only assumes what would result IF it were possible. So pointing out that prevention is not possible doesn’t undermine the argument.

We already know that iatrogenic disease results from treatments/hospitalization. So the author would already acknowledge that iatrogenic disease might result from other kinds of diseases. The conclusion doesn’t assume that eliminating iatrogenic disease is actually possible.

PrepTest 135 - Section 1 - Question 15

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action