Mismatched conclusion. This identifies a potentially biased sample, but goes too far with its conclusion. The stimulus argues that a biased sample can be misleading, not that it makes it impossible to ever reach an accurate understanding.

Mismatched premises and conclusion. This argues that our memory of 60s shows cannot be improved because we still regularly encounter such media today. The stimulus concludes that a particular biased sample leads to an inaccurate understanding, not that it’s impossible for one to improve their understanding.

This points out that a particular sample is unrepresentative and therefore likely to lead to a distorted perception. Gaming publishers were especially interested in using CD-ROMs, so basing one’s understanding on CD-ROM media would lead to a misperception about past trends.

Mismatched premises and conclusion. This argues that we have incomplete knowledge because we have incomplete evidence. The stimulus. however, claims that a biased sample leads to a distorted perception of the past.

Mismatched conclusion. This identifies a biased sample, but concludes that those who rely on such a sample are still likely to have an accurate perception. The stimulus, in contrast, concluded that such a sample results in an inaccurate perception.