PT136.S3.P2.Q10 > Analytics

Hide analysis

Passage A.

████████ ████ ████████ ████ ██ ██████ ███ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ███ ██ ███████ ██ ██ █████ ██████████ ███ ████████ ██████████ █████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████████ ███ ██████████████ ██ ███ ███████████████ ████████ ██████ █████ ███████ ██ ██ ████ █ ███████ █████████ ██████████ ███████ ██████████████ ██ ████ █████████ ██████████ ████ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ████████ ████ █████ ██ ████████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ████ ██ ████████ ███████ ████ ██████ █████ ████ █████████ █████████ ████ █████████ ███████ ████ ██ ████████ ██████ ████ █████ ████ ████ ████████████ ██ █████ ███ █████ ██ ███ █████ █████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ █████ ██████ █████████ ████████ ███ █████ ██ ███████ ██ ███████ ███████████ ██ ████ ██ ███████████████

Critique of history writing · It's boring

It's typically too formal and abstract, and doesn't help students connect to history emotionally.

██ ██ ██████ ██ ███████ ████ ████████ ████ ██████████ ████ █████ ██ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ ████ ██████ █████████ ██ █ ███ ██████ ███ ███████████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ███████████ █████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ███ ██████ ██████████ ████ ████████ ██████████ ██ █████████████ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ███████████ ████████████ ██████████ █████████ ██ ██████ ███ ████ ███████████ ██ █████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ █████ ███████ ███ ███ █████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ███ ████████ ███ █████ ███ ███████ ██ ██████████ ███████████ ███ ██ ███ █████ ███████████████ ████████ ████ ███ █████ ██████████ ██ ████████ ██ ███████████ ██ █████ █████████ ████ ███ ██████████ ███████ ███████ ██ ██████ █████████ ██ ███████ ███████ ██ ██████

Failed attempt at solution · Some historians have claimed to connect their writing to stories; they still write only boring stuff

Very few people historians actually incorporate stories into their writing.

███████ █

Context about legal writing · Values conformity, and doesn't have much creativity or humor

███████ █████ ██ ████ ███ █████ ███████ ██████ ████ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ███████████ ████████ ████████████ ███ █████████ ██████████████ ████ ███ █████ █████ ██████ ███████ ███ █████████ ███████████ ████ ███ █████████ ██ █████████ ██ █████ █████████ █████ ████ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ██ ███ ███ ███████ █████ ████ ████ █████████ ██████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ███ ██ ██ ███████████ ████ ████ █████ ████ ███ ██ ███ █████ █ ██████████ ████ ██████ ███ ███████ ██ █████████ ████████████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ███████ █████ ████████ ██████ ███ █████ █████████ ███████ ████ ███ █████████ █████████ █████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ████████ █████ ██ ███ ██ ██ █████ ██ ██ ████ ██████

Critique of legal writing · It's boring because it leaves out the story

Lawyers learn this kind of boring writing from teachers of legal writing.

Potential solution · Become more aware about the value of story in legal writing

Not sure if this will actually change how legal writing is taught, but it might help.

Passage Style

10.

In which one of the █████████ ████ ███ ███ ████████ ███ █████████

Question Type

Describe approach

Structure

This Describe Approach question asks for a way that the two passages are not parallel. We can approach this question like an LR Method of Reasoning question.

Split Approach: After passage A, eliminate any answer choices that don’t accurately describe passage A. Then, after passage B, eliminate the remaining answer choices that don’t accurately describe passage B.

Sequential Approach: We will approach this question with the process of elimination. Eliminate any answer choices that do not accurately describe how both passages operate.

Passage A presents ███ ███████ █████████ ███ ██ ████████ █████████ ███████ ███████ █ ████ ████

Passage A doesn’t present and reject arguments for an opposing position––the passage doesn’t even consider an opposing position––so we can eliminate (A).

Passage A makes ██████████ ███████ ███████ ███████ █ ████ ████

Passage A does make evaluative claims (for example, that the historiographic approach is harmful). However, passage B makes evaluative claims too, so we can eliminate (B).

12%

Passage A describes ████████ ████████ ██ █ ██████████ ██ ███████████ ███████ ███████ █ ████ ████

Passage A does describe specific examples of a phenomenon that it criticizes (specifically, the examples of papers that use “narrative” in their titles but don’t actually tell stories). Additionally, passage B does not include specific examples. (C) accurately describes the way that the passages do not parallel.

67%

Passage B offers ██████████ ███████ ███████ █ ████ ████

Passage A does offer criticism, so we can eliminate (D). Passage A criticizes the dry, abstract approach to historical writing.

Passage B outlines █ ███████ ███████ ███████ █ ████ ████

Passage A does not outline a theory, so we can eliminate (E). Passage B doesn’t outline a theory either.

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

It takes about five minutes.

Take the free diagnostic

More free LSAT prep: Sample LSAT questions Full-length diagnostic & practice test All free LSAT resources

PrepTest 136 - Section 3 - Passage 2 - Question 10

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action

PrepTest 136 - Section 3 - Passage 2 - Question 10

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Want to know why the right answer is right?