Free LSAT resources
Free law school admissions resources
Comparative
(Co)
Comparative
(Co)
RC passages that are split into two mini-passages, with questions that ask us to compare or contrast them with one another.
Avg. 5.4 per section
Key tactics
- There are two distinct methods of attacking comparative passages:
- The split approach involves reading passage A first, solving any questions that ask only about that passage and eliminating any answers you can from questions that ask about both passages, only then returning to read passage B.
- The sequential approach more closely mirrors the normal method (reading both passages up front identifying different perspectives and key concepts), but with the additional goal of identifying points of contact between the two passages (i.e. disagreements, agreements, or subjects they approach from different angles).
- You should keep an open mind about which approach is best for you. Try each on several passages, timed and untimed, before deciding which you prefer.
Alternate explanation
Analogy (LR)
Argument part
Bad authority
Causal chain
Causal mechanism
Causal reasoning
Circular reasoning
Conditional reasoning
Confusing sufficiency and necessity
Correlation
Diagram?
Directionally wrong
Eliminating options
Equivocation
Evaluate
Except (LR)
Failed alternate explanation
False dichotomy
Fighting the hypothetical
Fill in the blank
Flaw or descriptive weakening
Illusory inconsistency
Inference
Internal contradiction
Irrelevant corroboration
Kick it up
Lack of support v. false conclusion
Link assumption
Main conclusion or main point
Math
Mental state v. reality
Method of reasoning or descriptive
Miscellaneous (LR)
Misdirected response
Most strongly supported
Must be false
Must be true
Necessary assumption
Parallel flawed method of reasoning
Parallel method of reasoning
Part v. whole
Phenomenon-hypothesis (LR)
Plausibility
Point at issue: agree
Point at issue: disagree
Principle
PSA - find or complete the application
PSA - find the rule
Quantifier
Relative v. absolute
Resolve reconcile or explain
Rule-application
Sampling
Source attack
Strengthen
Sufficient assumption
Time
Unwarranted assumption
Value judgment
Weaken
Weighing factors
Analogy (RC)
Application
Art
Author’s attitude
Author’s perspective
Comparative
Critique or debate
Describe approach
Describe organization
Describe relationship
Except (RC)
Humanities
Implied
Law
Logical continuation
Main point
Meaning in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Miscellaneous (RC)
Other’s perspective
Phenomenon-hypothesis (RC)
Principle or generalization
Problem-analysis
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Purpose of paragraph
Purpose of passage
Science
Single position
Spotlight
Stated
Structure
WSE (RC)