PT136.S3.P2.Q12 > Analytics

Hide analysis

Passage A.

████████ ████ ████████ ████ ██ ██████ ███ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ███ ██ ███████ ██ ██ █████ ██████████ ███ ████████ ██████████ █████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████████ ███ ██████████████ ██ ███ ███████████████ ████████ ██████ █████ ███████ ██ ██ ████ █ ███████ █████████ ██████████ ███████ ██████████████ ██ ████ █████████ ██████████ ████ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ████████ ████ █████ ██ ████████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ████ ██ ████████ ███████ ████ ██████ █████ ████ █████████ █████████ ████ █████████ ███████ ████ ██ ████████ ██████ ████ █████ ████ ████ ████████████ ██ █████ ███ █████ ██ ███ █████ █████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ █████ ██████ █████████ ████████ ███ █████ ██ ███████ ██ ███████ ███████████ ██ ████ ██ ███████████████

Critique of history writing · It's boring

It's typically too formal and abstract, and doesn't help students connect to history emotionally.

██ ██ ██████ ██ ███████ ████ ████████ ████ ██████████ ████ █████ ██ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ ████ ██████ █████████ ██ █ ███ ██████ ███ ███████████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ███████████ █████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ███ ██████ ██████████ ████ ████████ ██████████ ██ █████████████ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ███████████ ████████████ ██████████ █████████ ██ ██████ ███ ████ ███████████ ██ █████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ █████ ███████ ███ ███ █████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ███ ████████ ███ █████ ███ ███████ ██ ██████████ ███████████ ███ ██ ███ █████ ███████████████ ████████ ████ ███ █████ ██████████ ██ ████████ ██ ███████████ ██ █████ █████████ ████ ███ ██████████ ███████ ███████ ██ ██████ █████████ ██ ███████ ███████ ██ ██████

Failed attempt at solution · Some historians have claimed to connect their writing to stories; they still write only boring stuff

Very few people historians actually incorporate stories into their writing.

███████ █

Context about legal writing · Values conformity, and doesn't have much creativity or humor

███████ █████ ██ ████ ███ █████ ███████ ██████ ████ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ███████████ ████████ ████████████ ███ █████████ ██████████████ ████ ███ █████ █████ ██████ ███████ ███ █████████ ███████████ ████ ███ █████████ ██ █████████ ██ █████ █████████ █████ ████ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ██ ███ ███ ███████ █████ ████ ████ █████████ ██████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ███ ██ ██ ███████████ ████ ████ █████ ████ ███ ██ ███ █████ █ ██████████ ████ ██████ ███ ███████ ██ █████████ ████████████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ███████ █████ ████████ ██████ ███ █████ █████████ ███████ ████ ███ █████████ █████████ █████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ████████ █████ ██ ███ ██ ██ █████ ██ ██ ████ ██████

Critique of legal writing · It's boring because it leaves out the story

Lawyers learn this kind of boring writing from teachers of legal writing.

Potential solution · Become more aware about the value of story in legal writing

Not sure if this will actually change how legal writing is taught, but it might help.

Passage Style

12.

Suppose that a lawyer is ███████ █ █████ ████████ ██████████ ███ █████ ████ ███ ██ █████ ██ █ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ █ █████ ██ ████ ██████ ██ ██████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ██ ████ ██ ███ █████████

Question Type

Author’s perspective

Implied

This is an Inference question from the perspective of the author of passage B. Author B says that legal writing tends to focus on the abstract form of the case, and that legal writing often emphasizes conformity over creativity.

It will be ██████ ███████ ███████ ███ ██████ ███ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ███ █████ ████████ ██████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ ███████ ██████ ██████

Author B does say that legal writing is often done badly, but the reason for this isn’t because they’re missing explicit advice from professors. Instead, author B thinks that these lawyers write badly because this is the way they were taught to write.

It will be ███████ ██ ████████ ████ █ █████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███ ███████████ ██ ███ ██████ ████████ ██ ███ █████

Actually, author B thinks that the problem with legal writing is that it ignores the narrative aspect, so we can infer that author B would disagree with (B).

It will be █ ████████ ████████████ █████ ██ ███████ ████ ██████████ █████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ █████

Actually, author B says that legal writing is often written badly, so the author probably wouldn’t expect the document to be well-crafted.

10%

It will not █████████ ██████ ███ █████ █████████ ██ ███ █████ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████ ███ ████████ ███ ██ ██ ███ ████████

This is supported. In P4, author B says that legal writing removes the human narrative aspect, so author B would agree with this prediction.

86%

It will neglect ██ ████ ███████████ ███████████ ███████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ████ ███ ████████ █████ ██████████

Unsupported. Author B never indicates that legal writing neglects to make these relevant connections.

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

It takes about five minutes.

Take the free diagnostic

More free LSAT prep: Sample LSAT questions Full-length diagnostic & practice test All free LSAT resources

PrepTest 136 - Section 3 - Passage 2 - Question 12

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action

PrepTest 136 - Section 3 - Passage 2 - Question 12

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Want to know why the right answer is right?