PT136.S3.P2.Q9 > Analytics

Hide analysis

Passage A.

████████ ████ ████████ ████ ██ ██████ ███ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ███ ██ ███████ ██ ██ █████ ██████████ ███ ████████ ██████████ █████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████████ ███ ██████████████ ██ ███ ███████████████ ████████ ██████ █████ ███████ ██ ██ ████ █ ███████ █████████ ██████████ ███████ ██████████████ ██ ████ █████████ ██████████ ████ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ████████ ████ █████ ██ ████████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ████ ██ ████████ ███████ ████ ██████ █████ ████ █████████ █████████ ████ █████████ ███████ ████ ██ ████████ ██████ ████ █████ ████ ████ ████████████ ██ █████ ███ █████ ██ ███ █████ █████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ █████ ██████ █████████ ████████ ███ █████ ██ ███████ ██ ███████ ███████████ ██ ████ ██ ███████████████

Critique of history writing · It's boring

It's typically too formal and abstract, and doesn't help students connect to history emotionally.

██ ██ ██████ ██ ███████ ████ ████████ ████ ██████████ ████ █████ ██ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ ████ ██████ █████████ ██ █ ███ ██████ ███ ███████████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ███████████ █████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ███ ██████ ██████████ ████ ████████ ██████████ ██ █████████████ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ███████████ ████████████ ██████████ █████████ ██ ██████ ███ ████ ███████████ ██ █████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ █████ ███████ ███ ███ █████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ███ ████████ ███ █████ ███ ███████ ██ ██████████ ███████████ ███ ██ ███ █████ ███████████████ ████████ ████ ███ █████ ██████████ ██ ████████ ██ ███████████ ██ █████ █████████ ████ ███ ██████████ ███████ ███████ ██ ██████ █████████ ██ ███████ ███████ ██ ██████

Failed attempt at solution · Some historians have claimed to connect their writing to stories; they still write only boring stuff

Very few people historians actually incorporate stories into their writing.

███████ █

Context about legal writing · Values conformity, and doesn't have much creativity or humor

███████ █████ ██ ████ ███ █████ ███████ ██████ ████ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ███████████ ████████ ████████████ ███ █████████ ██████████████ ████ ███ █████ █████ ██████ ███████ ███ █████████ ███████████ ████ ███ █████████ ██ █████████ ██ █████ █████████ █████ ████ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ██ ███ ███ ███████ █████ ████ ████ █████████ ██████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ███ ██ ██ ███████████ ████ ████ █████ ████ ███ ██ ███ █████ █ ██████████ ████ ██████ ███ ███████ ██ █████████ ████████████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ███████ █████ ████████ ██████ ███ █████ █████████ ███████ ████ ███ █████████ █████████ █████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ████████ █████ ██ ███ ██ ██ █████ ██ ██ ████ ██████

Critique of legal writing · It's boring because it leaves out the story

Lawyers learn this kind of boring writing from teachers of legal writing.

Potential solution · Become more aware about the value of story in legal writing

Not sure if this will actually change how legal writing is taught, but it might help.

Passage Style

Which one of the following ████ ████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███████████ █████████ ██ ███ █████████

Question Type

Stated

This Stated question asks what each passage says is typical of writing in each respective profession.

Split Approach: After reading passage A, eliminate any answers that don’t capture what passage A says about historical writing.

Then, after passage B, eliminate the remaining answers that don’t capture what passage B says about legal writing. Legal writing is discussed throughout passage B, so we will use the process of elimination.

Sequential Approach: We will approach this question with the process of elimination. Eliminate any answer choices that don’t describe both historical writing as described in passage A and legal writing as described in passage B.

abstraction

Passage A says that historical writing tends to turn history into an abstract debate. Passage B also says that legal analysis is focused on the abstract legal form of the case.

77%

hyperbole

Passage A doesn’t say that historical writing tends to be hyperbolic, so we can eliminate (B). Passage B doesn’t mention hyperbole either.

subversion

Passage A doesn’t say that historical writing tends to be subversive, so we can eliminate (C). Passage B says that attention to narrative is a potentially subversive trend that may eventually work its way into the legal curriculum, but author B doesn’t say that legal writing as it currently exists tends to be subversive.

12%

narrative

Actually, passage A says that historical writing needs more elements of narrative writing (and tht it still lacks the narrative elements), so we can eliminate (D). Also, passage B says that the narrative is currently left out of legal writing.

10%

imagination

Passage A doesn’t say that historical writing tends to be imaginative, so we can eliminate (E). Also, passage B doesn’t mention imagination in legal writing.

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

It takes about five minutes.

Take the free diagnostic

More free LSAT prep: Sample LSAT questions Full-length diagnostic & practice test All free LSAT resources

PrepTest 136 - Section 3 - Passage 2 - Question 9

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action

PrepTest 136 - Section 3 - Passage 2 - Question 9

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Want to know why the right answer is right?