Taking the explication of experience as its object as well as its method, Marjorie Shostak's . █████ ███ ████ ███ █████ ██ █ █████ █████ ██████ ████████ █████ █████████ ████████ ███ ██ █████ ██ ██████████ ███ ██████████████ ████████ ███ ███ ███████ ███ ███ ██████████ ███
████ ████████ ██████ ███████████ ██ █████ ██ █████ ████ ████ ███ ███ ███████ ███████ ████████ ███ █████████ █ ██████ ██
█████ ████ ██████ █████████████ ███ █████████ ██ █████████ ████████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ██ ███████ ██████ ████████ ██ █████ ██ ██ ██ ██ █ █████ ███████ ████ █████ ██ ██████ ███████ █████████ █████ ██ ██ ██ ██ █ ███████ ██ █████ ██████ ███████ ██████████ ███ ████ ███ ███████ ███████████ ███ ███████ ██████████ ██ ████████ ██ ██ █ ████████ █████ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ████████████ ██████████ █████ ███ ███████████ ██ █████ █████ ██████
██████ █████ ██ ██████████ ████ █████████ ████████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ██ █████ ████ █████ ██ █████ █████████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██████ █████████████ ██ █ ████████ █████████ ██ █ ██████████ ██████ ███ ██ ██ ██████████ ███ ███████ ██ █ ██████████████ ███████ ██ ███████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ██ █ ███████ ███████ ███████ █
Which one of the following ████ █████████ ███ ████████ ███████ ██ ███ ███ ████ ████████████ ██████████ █████ ████ ███████ █████ ██ ██████
It is admirable ████ ████ ████████████ ███████ █████ ███ ██████ █████ ██ ████ ██████ ████████ ███████ ██ ██ █████ ████ ███████ █████ ██ ██████
This is the opposite of the author’s view. The author tells us that it’s a “
It is encouraging ████ ████ █████ █████████████ ████ █████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ███ █████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ██████ ████ ██████
The author doesn’t indicate that “most” women ethnographers have begun to study and report the views of women they study.
It is unfortunate ████ ████ ████████████ ██████████ ████ ███ ████ ████ ███████ █████ ██ █████ ██ ████
This is the closest to capturing the author’s negative opinion about the way in which most ethnographic literature deals with women’s views of women. The author tells us that it’s a “salutary shock to realize how much ethnographic literature omits the lack perspective of women.” This indicates that the author believes the lack of women’s perspective in ethnographic literature is something negative. That’s why the presence of this perspective in Shostak’s work is “salutary” (beneficial).
It is surprising ████ ████ ████████████ ███████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ███ ███ ███████████ █████████ ███████ ██████████ ██████████ ██ █████ █████ ██████
This doesn’t capture the author’s negative opinion about the way in which most ethnographic literature deals with women’s views of women. The author’s complaint isn’t that it’s surprising more studies don’t use the available information from interviews. Rather, the author thinks it’s disappointing that studies don’t even think to include the perspective of women on women. Whether that information comes from interviews or other sources doesn’t matter.
It is disappointing ████ ████ ████████████ ███████ ██ ███████ █████ █████ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ██████████ ███████████ ████ ██████ ███████ ███████
The author doesn’t indicate that most ethnographic studies of women study individual experiences. Rather, most studies focus on the general and anonymous. What’s disappointing is that most ethnographic studies don’t include women’s perspective on women.