Taking the explication of experience as its object as well as its method, Marjorie Shostak's . βββββ βββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββ β βββββ βββββ ββββββ ββββββββ βββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ βββ ββ βββββ ββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββ βββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββββ βββ
ββββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββ βββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββββ β ββββββ ββ
βββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββ ββ ββ ββ ββ β βββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββ ββ ββββββ βββββββ βββββββββ βββββ ββ ββ ββ ββ β βββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββ βββ βββββββ βββββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ ββ β ββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββ ββββββ
ββββββ βββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββββββ βββββββββββββ ββ β ββββββββ βββββββββ ββ β ββββββββββ ββββββ βββ ββ ββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ β ββββββββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββ β βββββββ βββββββ βββββββ β
Which one of the following ββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββ ββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββ ββ ββββββ
It is admirable ββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ βββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ βββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββ ββ βββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββ ββ ββββββ
This is the opposite of the authorβs view. The author tells us that itβs a β
It is encouraging ββββ ββββ βββββ βββββββββββββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββββ ββββββ
The author doesnβt indicate that βmostβ women ethnographers have begun to study and report the views of women they study.
It is unfortunate ββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββ ββ βββββ ββ ββββ
This is the closest to capturing the authorβs negative opinion about the way in which most ethnographic literature deals with womenβs views of women. The author tells us that itβs a βsalutary shock to realize how much ethnographic literature omits the lack perspective of women.β This indicates that the author believes the lack of womenβs perspective in ethnographic literature is something negative. Thatβs why the presence of this perspective in Shostakβs work is βsalutaryβ (beneficial).
It is surprising ββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββββ ββ βββ βββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββ ββββββ
This doesnβt capture the authorβs negative opinion about the way in which most ethnographic literature deals with womenβs views of women. The authorβs complaint isnβt that itβs surprising more studies donβt use the available information from interviews. Rather, the author thinks itβs disappointing that studies donβt even think to include the perspective of women on women. Whether that information comes from interviews or other sources doesnβt matter.
It is disappointing ββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββ βββββ βββββ ββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββ βββββββ
The author doesnβt indicate that most ethnographic studies of women study individual experiences. Rather, most studies focus on the general and anonymous. Whatβs disappointing is that most ethnographic studies donβt include womenβs perspective on women.
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnostic