This is unsupported. The stimulus says that love and friendship must be the primary motivators of a society in order for people to be happy. As far as we know, economic utility can still be one of the society’s motivators, it just must not be the primary motivator.

This is unsupported. The satisfaction of economic needs is not presented as necessary for happiness. Rather, a society motivated by love and friendship is necessary. Perhaps one could live in a society motivated by love, be economically unsatisfied, and still be happy.

This is unsupported. The stimulus does not give us any information about whether a person can or cannot satisfy their economic needs through family and friends. We only know that economic needs can be satisfied in a society “where only economic utility motivates action.”

This is strongly supported. Humans must live in a society primarily motivated by love and friendship in order to obtain happiness. Humans can satisfy their basic economic needs outside of such a society. Thus, humans can satisfy their economic needs without obtaining happiness.

This is anti-supported. The stimulus tells us that humans can satisfy their economic needs in a society primarily motivated by economic utility. In such a society, people are not happy. So a person does not need to be happy in order to be economically satisfied.