PT137.S4.Q1 > Analytics

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

Prosperity increases carbon dioxide emissions, which drive global warming. As people become wealthier, they buy more energy-consuming items like cars, leading to higher emissions. Conversely, when countries experience economic recessions—when prosperity drops—they see significant decreases in carbon dioxide levels.

The main conclusion is the economist’s hypothesis that prosperity drives higher carbon dioxide levels, the main cause of global warming.

This is context. It gives the background needed to understand the argument by explaining why the author is discussing carbon dioxide emissions. The main conclusion, however, is that prosperity increases carbon dioxide emissions, not that carbon dioxide causes global warming.

This accurately captures the argument's main conclusion that prosperity drives increased carbon dioxide emissions, simply rephrasing "driving force" as "important cause."

This restates part of the argument's first premise. The fact that rising incomes lead to more spending on energy-consuming devices supports the author's conclusion by providing evidence that increased prosperity results in higher carbon dioxide emissions.

This restates the argument's second premise. The fact that countries in recession saw steep drops in carbon emissions shows that without prosperity, emissions fall. Thus, prosperity likely causes increased carbon dioxide emissions.

This restates part of the argument's first premise. The fact that energy-consuming devices cause increased carbon dioxide makes it more likely that prosperity, which leads people to buy more of these devices, is a driving force behind rising carbon dioxide emissions.

Question

95% of people who answer get this correct

This is a slightly challenging question.

CURVE

Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right

25% 132

139

75% 146

Question Stem Tags

Main conclusion or main point

Stimulus Tags

Causal reasoning

Popularity Avg. score

152

95%

164

152

144

155

You don't have any history with this question.. yet!

PrepTest 137 - Section 4 - Question 1

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action