PT137.S4.Q14

PrepTest 137 - Section 4 - Question 14

Show summary

Astronomer: Does a recent meteorite from Mars contain fossilized bacteria. █████████ ██████ █ ██████████ ██████ ████ ███ █████████████ ██████████ █████ ██ ███ █████████ ██████ ██ ██████████ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ████ ███ █████████ ██ █ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████ █████████ ████████ ███████ ████ ██████ ██ ██████ █████ ████ ███ ██████ ███ █████ ██ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████████ ███ ████████ ████ ███████ ████████ █████ ██████ ██ █████████ ██ █ ███████ ██ █████ ██████ ██████ ████ █████ ██ █████ █████████ ████ ██ █████ ███████

Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis

The astronomer concludes that the structures found in the meteorite could be bacteria, rejecting Tagar’s claim that they’re too small. The author rejects Tagar’s view because two other biologists hold a differing view that could explain the structures’ small size.

Identify and Describe Flaw

The problem with this argument is that the astronomer gives no reason for siding with Swiderski and Terrada instead of Tagar. In order to prove this conclusion, the argument would need to provide support for Swiderski and Terrada’s claim that bacteria would shrink when they’re short on nutrients, but since it doesn’t, the astronomer’s preference for their view is arbitrary. The astronomer overlooks the possibility that Tagar could have the correct position.

Show answer
14.

Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ █ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ████████████ █████████

a

The argument presumes, ███████ █████████ ██████████████ ████ ███ ███████████ █████ ████ ██████ ████ ███ █████ ██████████ ██ █████

b

The argument provides ██ █████████████ ███ ██████ ██████████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ███ ██████ ████ ███ █████ ██ ███ █████████ ████ ██ ████████████

c

The argument takes ███ ███████ ████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████████ ██████████ █ ██████████ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ ██████████ ███

d

The argument appeals ██ █████ ████ ██████████ ██████ ████ ███████ ███ ████████

e

The argument presumes, ███████ █████████ ██████████████ ████ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ███████ ███ ███████ ██████████

Confirm action

Are you sure?