This is a premise. It supports the conclusion by highlighting the limitations of focusing only on computational ability in AI research. It suggests that ignoring other skills will result in devices as limited as a person lacking emotions, underscoring the need for broader focus.

This captures the argument’s main conclusion. It paraphrases its central point: without a significant shift in the current focus of artificial intelligence research, which is too narrowly centered on computational ability, researchers will not create truly intelligent machines.

The stimulus doesn't make this argument. It only states that current research has not created true intelligence but does not discuss the objective of AI research. While the author might agree with this goal, the author doesn’t make this claim in the stimulus.

The stimulus doesn’t make this claim. It states that truly intelligent machines need more than computational ability, like humans need more than cognitive responses, but it doesn’t compare their importance or argue that true machine intelligence requires noncognitive responses.

The stimulus does not make this claim. The stimulus states that truly intelligent machines need more than computational ability, like humans need more than cognitive responses, but the stimulus does not argue that true machine intelligence requires noncognitive responses.