Subscription pricing
passage 3
Passage A is from a 2007 article on the United States patent system; passage B is from a corporate statement.
███████ █
P1
██████████████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ ████ ████████ ██ █████ ███████ ███
Critique ·
Of patent system
In theory, it should only be the "nonobvious" inventions that get patens.
Example ·
Patent upheld for "obvious" translation between Internet address and telephone number
P2
██ ██ █████ ██████ ███████ █████ ██ ██████ ██████ ████ █████████ █████
Critique ·
Patents too broad
In theory, patents should be narrow enough so others can "invent around" existing patents. But recently, patents are so broad that that's getting difficult.
P3
█████ ██████████ █████████ ████ █████████ ██ ████ █████████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ██████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ████████████ ██ █████████ ████████ ██ ████ █████████ ██ ████████ █ ███████ ███ ███████ █
Negative Consequence ·
Large tech companies stockpile patents
This way, if they get sued for patent violations, they can countersue. If you're not a part of this "arms race" then you are defenseless against law suits.
P4
████████ ███████ ███ ████████████ ████ ███ █████ ███████ ████████ ██ █████████ ████
Negative Consequence ·
Software
This problem is particularly bad in software. A critical component can be patented. It can be challenging to discover whether something is under patent protection.
███████ █
P5
████████ ██████ ████ ████ ████ ████████████ █████ ███ ████████ ████ ███████ █████████ ██████ ██████████ ██ ████████ ███████████ ███ ███ ████████████ ████ ████████████████ █████████ ██ ████ ████████ ██ ████ ██ ███████ ████ ████████ ███ ███ ███████ ██ ████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████████████ ████████ ██████████ ██ ████ ██ █████ ███████████ ███████ ███ ████ ████████ ██████ █████ ██████████ ██ ████████ ████████
One Company's Perspective ·
Patents impede innovation; open-source is better
Whereas Passage A describes the problem with patents in software from a high level, Passage B takes the perspective of one software company affected by this problem and how they are responding to it.
P6
██ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ██ ███ ███ ████ █████ █████████ ███████ ████████ ████████ █ █████ ██████ ██ ████ █████ █████████ ████ ███████ █████ ███████ ██ ████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ████ ███████ ████████ ██████ ██████████ ███ ████ ███ ██████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████████ ██████ ██ ████ ████████ ███████ █████████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ██ ██████ ███████████
Agreement ·
Software patents are a problem
This company agrees with Passage A that the "arms race" is bad for the industry.
P7
███ ███████ ███████ ████ ██████ ██ ██ ███████ █ █████████████ █████████ ██ ████████ ███████ ███ █████████ █████████ ████ ████████ ███████ ████ ███████████ ███ ████████████ ██████ ████ █████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ███ ██ ██ ███████ ██ ███████ ███ ███████ ███ ███████████ ██████████ ██ ████ ███████ ██ █████
Behavior ·
Amass a portfolio of patents
The company participates in the "arms race" but expresses regret. They have to do this even though they recognize that this is not good for the industry.
Passage Style
19.
The authors of the passages █████ ██ ████ ██████ ██ █████ ████ ████████ █████████ █████ ██ ████ ███████ ██
a
amass their own ██████████ ██ ████████ ███████
b
attempt to license ████████ ████████ ██ █████ █████████
c
exploit patents already █████ ██ ███████████
d
refrain from infringing ██ ███ ███████ ████ ██ █████ █████████
e
research the patents ████████ ██ █████ ████████ ████ ██████████