People may praise the talent of a painter capable of realistically portraying a scene and dismiss as artistically worthless the efforts of abstract expressionists, but obviously Conclusion an exact replica of the scene depicted is not the only thing people appreciate in a painting, for Support otherwise photography would have entirely displaced painting as an art form.
The author concludes that exact replication is not the only quality viewers value in a painting. He supports this by contending that, if this wasn’t the case, photography would have replaced painting as an art form by now.
The author is supporting a conclusion about people’s preferences in visual art by citing a relevant fact. Note that this is an “is” conclusion, not an “ought” conclusion: the author is talking about what people do like, not what they should like.
The argument proceeds by
using a claim █████ ████ ████ ██████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ██ █████████ █████████
appealing to an █████████ █████████ ██ ██████ ███ ██████ ████ ██████ ████
explaining a historical ████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████████ ██ ██████
appealing to a ██████████ ████ ██ ███████ █ █████ █████ ████████ ████████ ███████████
considering historical context ██ ██████ ███ ████████ ███████████ ██ ██████