PT141.S2.Q14 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15

PASSAGE 3

Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 4 · lr

Winona concludes that it's "absurd" for Inez to justify funding space-exploration programs by claiming they will lead to technological advances with practical applications. Winona supports this by saying that if practical technology is the goal, it should be funded directly.

Winona counters Inez’s argument by pointing out that the goal of practical technology can be pursued without funding space-exploration programs.

Winona doesn’t argue that funding space-exploration programs won’t lead to technological advances with practical applications. She just argues that these technological advances should be pursued and funded directly instead.

Winona doesn’t present any evidence against space-exploration programs. She just argues that funding these programs isn’t necessary to pursuing advances in practical technology.

Winona doesn’t reject any of Inez’s evidence. Instead, she rejects the idea that funding space-exploration programs is justified because it will lead to practical technology.

Winona argues that the beneficial effects that Inez desires— advances in practical technology— can be achieved through direct funding, not that they can be achieved “only at great expense.”

Winona claims that advances in practical technology could be pursued directly, without the space-exploration programs Inez endorses.

PrepTest 141 - Section 2 - Question 14

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action