Wrong trigger. It’s the pristine natural landscape that’s at risk here, not any existing historical buildings. The residents oppose the project precisely because there are no buildings currently on the land.

Leads to the wrong conclusion. This principle would have the residents purchase the land in question, but that's not their conclusion. The correct principle would justify concluding that the construction project simply should not continue.

Wrong trigger. The painter is recently deceased, and we don't know of any demands made by the painter; it’s the residents who want to protect the landscape. The correct answer must justify the residents’ opposition to the project purely based on the land's historical and artistic value.

We know that the construction plan runs counter to the historical and artistic interests of the community, so this principle triggers. And it leads to the correct conclusion that those interests restrict one’s right to build on their land, so it helps to justify the residents’ resistance.

Leads to the wrong conclusion. The residents aren’t seeking to change the town codes. The correct answer must justify their opposition to the project even though it doesn’t break the rules. Also, access to the site isn't the issue; changing the landscape's appearance is.