Archaeologists are discovering a great deal about the Sals culture. ███ ████████ ██████ ███████████ ████ █████████ ████████ ████████ ███ █████ ██ ███████ ██████ ███ ███████ █████ ████ ████████ ████ █████ ███ ██████ ███ ███ ███████ ███ ████ ███ █████ █████ ███ ████ ███ ███ █████ █████
The author concludes that the Sals did not smelt iron. This is based on the fact that the Sals did not have any distinct words for iron.
The premise establishes that Sals didn’t have distinct words for iron. Does that guarantee that the Sals did not smelt iron? No. What does lacking a distinct word for a thing have to do with smelting the thing? To make the argument valid, we want to form a link to get from the premise to the conclusion:
If the Sals didn’t have a distinct word for a thing, then the Sals did not smelt the thing.
Another way to phrase the relationship we’re looking for:
If the Sals smelted the thing, then they had a distinct word for the thing.
The conclusion drawn above follows █████████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
If a culture ███ █ ████████ ████ ███ █ ██████ ████ ██ ███████ ████ ██████
If a culture ███ ██████████ ████ █ ██████ ████ ██ ███ ███ ████ █ ████████ ████ ███ ████ ██████
If a culture ███████ ██████ ███ ███████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ █████ ███ ██████ ███ ███████
If a culture ███ ███ █████ █ ██████ ████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████ ████ ██████
If a culture ███████ █ ██████ ████ ██ ███ █ ████████ ████ ███ ████ ██████