Principle: Any person or business knowingly aiding someone's infringement on a copyright is also guilty of copyright infringement.
████████████ █████████ ██████████ ██████ █████ ████████ █ ████████████ ██████████████ ██████ ██ ██████ ██ █████████ ████████████ █████ █ ████████ █████ ███ █████ █████████ ██ █ ███████ ██████████████ █████████ ██ ████████ ███████████ █████ █████████ ██ ████ ██ ███ █████████████
Principle:
Knowingly aids someone’s infringement on a copyright → guilty of copyright infringement
Premise:
A customer using Grandview’s kiosk infringed on a copyright by printing photographs whose copyright is held by someone else.
Conclusion:
Grandview is guilty of copyright infringement.
We want to learn that Grandview KNOWINGLY aided the customer’s copyright infringement. All we know right now is that Grandview had a self-service kiosk that allowed the customer to infringe. If we learned, for example, that allowing someone to infringe copyright is equivalent to knowingly aiding that infringement, then we could conclude that Grandview is guilty of copyright infringement.
Which one of the following, ██ ████████ ████ █████ ██ ███████ ███ ███████████ ██ ███ ██████████
The operator of █ ████████ ███ ███ ████ █████ ███████████ ██ █████████ ███ ███ ████████████ ██████████ ██ ██ ███ ██ █████████ ███ ███ ████████████ ███████████
The management of █ ████████ ████ ██ ████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ █████████ ██ ██████ ██ ███ ███████████ ███ ███████ ████████ ████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ █████████
The owner of █ ████████████ ████████ █████ ██████ ████ █ ██████ ████████ █████████ ████ ███████████ ████████ ██████ ███ ██ ███████ ██ ███ █████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ █████████ ███████
Owners of self-service ██████████ ██████ ███████ █████ ██████████ ██ █████ ██ ██████ ████ ████ ███ ███ ████ ███ ███████ ██ █████████ █████████
A person or ████████ █████████ █ ███████ ████ ███ ██ ████████ ██ ██ ████ ██ ████████ ██ █ █████████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████████ ███ ███ █████████ █████████ █████ ███ ████████