PT145.S2.Q7 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 4 · lr

The author concludes that if a piece sold as amber contains an insect that looks normal, it is more likely to be fake than if the amber doesn’t contain a normal-looking insect. The author supports the argument by establishing that forgers often add normal-looking insects to fake amber in order to make more money.

The author assumes that real pieces sold as amber are not as likely to contain normal-appearing insects as are forged amber pieces.

This is irrelevant. The author is only making a claim about what characteristics make pieces more likely to be fake, a claim for which it doesn’t matter whether certain types of vendors are trying to ensure authenticity.

The sizes of different pieces sold as amber are irrelevant to the author’s claim about what kinds of pieces are more likely to be fake based on the appearance of the insects inside.

The relative price of amber based on what type of life form it contains is irrelevant; the author is only making a claim about what kinds of pieces sold as insect-containing amber are more likely to be fake.

This is irrelevant, since the author is not discussing the authenticity of pieces sold as amber based on the amber material itself, but rather based on the appearance of the insects embedded in pieces sold as amber.

This strengthens the argument by affirming the assumption that real pieces of amber are not likely to contain normal-looking insects, because they are instead likely to contain awkward- or grotesque-looking insects (if they contain insects at all).

PrepTest 145 - Section 2 - Question 7

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action