Economist: Conclusion Unemployment will soon decrease. ββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ βββββββββββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββ βββ βββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββββ βββββββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββ βββββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ βββββββββββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββ βββ ββββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββββ
The author concludes that unemployment will soon decrease. This is based on the following:
If total gov. spending significantly increases next year, unemployment will decrease.
If total gov. spending significantly decreases next year, unemployment will decrease.
We have two triggers that can prove unemployment will decrease β gov. spending significantly increases or it significantly decreases next year. But do we know that either of those will actually occur? No. So to make the argument valid, we want to know that next year, gov. spending will significantly increase or it will significantly decrease.
The conclusion drawn by the βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ
Either total government ββββββββ ββββ βββββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββ
Government officials are βββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββ βββββββββββββ
If there is β βββββββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββ ββ β βββββββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββββββββ
A significant increase ββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββ
If the economy ββ βββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ
