Trade negotiator: Support Increasing economic prosperity in a country tends to bring political freedom to its inhabitants. ██████████ ██ ██ █████ ███ ███ ███████ ██ █████ █████ ████████ ████ ███ ██████ ██ █████████ ██████ ██████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ █████ ████████
The negotiator concludes that it’s wrong to adopt trade policies that hurt the growth in prosperity of any other country because doing so would take away from the political freedom that prosperity tends to bring.
The negotiator describes a negative-sounding effect of hindering another country’s prosperity—doing so impedes the growth of that country’s inhabitants’ political freedom. However, this alone isn’t enough to prove that no country should ever adopt trade policies with this effect.
To justify the negotiator’s conclusion, we’re looking for a principle that confirms that no policy should be adopted if that policy will hinder the growth of another population’s political freedom.
Which one of the following ███████████ ██ ██████ █████ ████ ████ ██ ███████ ███ █████ ████████████ ██████████
Every country should █████ ██ █████ ████ ████████ ████ █████████ ███ ███████████ ██ █████████ ███████ ██ █████ ██████████
Both economic prosperity ███ █████████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ ███████ ██████████ ██ ███ █████████ ████████████
The primary reason ████ ███ ███████ █████ ████████ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████ █████████ ███████ ██ ████ ████████
A country should ███ ██ ████████ ████ █████ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ █████████ ███████ ██ ███ █████ ████████
It is wrong ███ ███ ███████ ██ █████ █████ ████████ ████ █████ ████████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████████