Ana: On libertarian principles, Conclusion I oppose the proposed smoking ban. ββ ββ βββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββββ
βββββββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββ βββββ βββββ ββββ ββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββββ βββββ βββββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ
Ana opposes the proposed smoking ban because she thinks itβs not the governmentβs business to prevent people from doing stuff that harms only themselves.
Pankaj points out that the proposed ban would only apply in situations that expose other people to smoking. Smoking would still be allowed in private. The implicit point is that Anaβs libertarian principle isnβt a good reason for opposing the ban.
Weβre looking for a point of disagreement. They disagree over whether the proposed smoking ban would prevent people from doing things that harm only themselves. Ana thinks it would. Pankaj thinks it wouldnβt.
Analysis by Kevin_Lin
The dialogue provides the most βββββββ βββ βββ βββββ ββββ βββ βββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββ
it is the ββββββββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ
government should be ββββββββββ ββ βββββββββββ ββββββββββ
the proposed smoking βββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββββ
the proposed ban βββββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββ
there are cases ββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββββββββ