PT148.S4.Q8 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

The author concludes that legislation giving tax incentives and zoning variances related to renovation in selected areas is not good.

Why?

Because the main people who benefit from the legislation are professionals who can afford the cost of renovating buildings.

But the long-term residents of the area, whom the legislation is intended to benefit, are harmed by increased rent and taxes in the area, which could force them to leave.

The author assumes that if the main people who benefit from a legislation are not the people who the legislation is intended to benefit, then the legislation shouldn’t be considered good.

Compared to other answers, (A) most strengthens. It endorses the idea of using actual results to evaluate legislation, rather than just the legislation’s intent. This supports the author’s reliance on premises about who actually does or does not benefit from the legislation as part of reaching the conclusion that the legislation shouldn’t be commended.

(B) is designed to support a conclusion that wealthier people shouldn’t have too much influence on how a community is governed. But the argument concerns whether a particular kind of legislation should be commended, not whether some people should have less control over a community’s governance.

(C) doesn’t help us prove that the legislation isn’t good or commendable. We have no reason to think that the community’s tax laws and zoning regulations don’t apply equally to everyone in the area. They do apply to everyone — some people can benefit more than others, but that doesn’t mean they don’t apply to everyone. (Don’t confuse whether the laws apply to everyone equally with whether laws benefit everyone equally.)

The legislation at issue does benefit professionals. So we don’t know that it’s not to anyone’s benefit.

(E) gives us a reason to think the legislation might be good, because it benefits the well-to-do professionals. This undermines the argument.

PrepTest 148 - Section 4 - Question 8

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action