PT149.S4.Q22

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1
Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2
Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

PASSAGE 3
Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4
Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 3 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 4 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

PrepTest 149 - Section 4 - Question 22

Question

Explanation

Analytics

Show analysis

A recent study revealed that Support people who follow precisely all the standard recommendations for avoidance of infection by pathogenic microorganisms in meat-based foods are more likely to contract diseases caused by these pathogens than are those who deviate considerably from the standard recommendations. ██████ ███ ████████ ███████████████ ███ █████████ ██ █████████ ██ █████ █████████ ████ ██ ██████████████████

Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis

The author argues that the standard recommendations for avoidance of infection must be counterproductive. She supports this by noting that those who follow the recommendations are more likely to contract diseases than are those who do not follow the recommendations.

Identify and Describe Flaw

This is a “correlation doesn’t imply causation” flaw, where the author sees a correlation and concludes that one thing causes the other without ruling out alternative hypotheses. The author overlooks two key alternatives:

(1) The causal relationship could be reversed—maybe people who follow the recommendations do so because they’re already at heightened risk of contracting infection!

(2) Some other factor could be causing the correlation—maybe there’s something completely separate that causes some people to both follow the recommendations and be at higher risk of disease.

Analysis by HollyShulman

Show answer

22.

The argument is most vulnerable ██ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ██ █████ ██ ████ ████ ███████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██████████████

Pathogenic microorganisms can █████████ ██ █████ ████ ███ ███ ███████████

This is irrelevant to the author’s argument. We’re talking about meat-based foods specifically, so information about non-meat-based foods wouldn’t make any difference!

Many people do ██████ █████████ ███ ███ ████████ ███████████████ ███ █████████ ██ █████████ ██ ██████████ ██████████████ ██ ██████████ ██████

This is irrelevant to the author’s argument. It doesn’t matter how many people follow the standard recommendations—whether it’s a lot or just a few, the fact remains that they are more likely than others to contract the diseases in question.

Not all diseases ██████ ██ ██████████████ ████ ███████ ████████████ █████████

The argument doesn’t require (and therefore doesn’t overlook) any discussion of symptoms. We can assume that the premises are true, meaning that the people we’re told have or have not contracted the diseases have been accurately diagnosed.

Preventing infection by ██████████ ██████████████ ██ ██████ █ ██████ ██ █████████ ███ ███████████ ███ ██ ████████████████

If (D) were true, then the author’s argument would be strengthened: we would be able to pinpoint the content of the standard recommendations as “inappropriate” and perhaps “counterproductive”. But we’re looking for a something the argument overlooks, not a strengthener!

Those most concerned ████ ████████ ██████████ ██████████ ████ ██████████ █████ ███ █████ ████ ███████████ ██ █████

This is overlooked by the author’s causation assumption. It’s possible that the recommendations cause disease contraction, but it’s also possible that those who follow the recommendations are a self-selected group who were more likely to contract the diseases to begin with!

Difficulty

Question

86% of people who answer get this correct

This is a moderately difficult question.

CURVE

Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right

25% 142

148

75% 155

Analysis

Question Stem Tags

Flaw or descriptive weakening

Stimulus Tags

Causal reasoning

Sampling

Answer Popularity

Popularity Avg. score

154

152

153

154

86%

164

Question history

You don't have any history with this question.. yet!