PT149.S4.Q3 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2

Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

PASSAGE 3

Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

The restaurant owner concludes that the critic who panned her restaurant is not a true restaurant critic. This is because the critic has no special expertise about food. The restaurant owner also supports her conclusion with an analogy to drama critics to imply that special training in a field is required to be a "true critic" in that field.

The conclusion is about the critic who panned the owner’s restaurant: “he is not a true restaurant critic.”

This is a premise that the restaurant owner uses to demonstrate that the critic isn’t a true restaurant critic. She uses the analogy of a drama critic to show that special expertise is required to be called a “true critic.”

This is support for the restaurant owner’s claim about the critic not being a “true critic.” A background in political reporting is very different than expertise in food and food preparation.

The restaurant owner concedes that the critic is a good writer but maintains he isn’t a true critic. This is neither a premise nor a conclusion.

This is what the restaurant owner is arguing for. Since the reporter lacks expertise in food and food preparation, and since newspapers wouldn't call someone a drama critic if the person has no special training in theater, the reporter isn’t a true restaurant critic.

This is a premise used to show why the reporter in question isn’t a true critic. The author references drama critics to imply that special training in a field is required to be a true critic in that field.

PrepTest 149 - Section 4 - Question 3

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action