To be considered for this year's Gillespie Grant, applications must be received in Gillespie City by October 1. ██ ███ ████ ██ ██ ███ ████ ███ ███████ ████ ████ █████████ ██ █████ █████████ █████ ██ ██ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ███████████ ██ ███████ ████ ████ ██████████ ███ ████ ██ ██████████ ███ ███ █████ ████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ ██████ ███ ████ ██████ ███ ███ █████
The author concludes that, if she’s using regular mail from Greendale, Mary must mail her application ten days before the due date to be considered for the grant. He supports this with the following premises:
(1) Applications must arrive in Gillespie City by October 1 to be considered.
(2) Regular mail from Greendale can take up to ten days to reach Gillespie City.
The author concludes that Mary must mail her application ten days before the due date to be considered for the grant. But his premises state that regular mail from Greendale can take up to ten days to reach Gillespie City. So he overlooks the possibility that some mail might take less than ten days.
What if Mary’s application only takes five days to arrive? In that case, he can’t conclude that she’ll only be considered if she mails it ten days before the due date.
The reasoning in the argument ██ ██████ ██ ████ ███ ████████
does not establish ████ ████ ██ ████████ ███ ███ █████████ █████ ██ ███████ ████████ ████ █████████
does not determine ███ ████ ██ █████ ███████ ████ ██ █████ █████████ ████ ████ █████████
does not consider ███ ███████ ██████ ██ ████ ██ █████ ███████ ████ ████ █████████ ██ █████ █████████ ████
presumes, without providing ██████████████ ████ ██ ██████ ███████████ ██ ████████ ██ █████████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ████ ███████ ███ ██ ███ █████ ████████████ ██ ███ █████████ █████ ███████████
overlooks the possibility ████ ████ ██████ ██ ███████ ████ ███ ███████████ ████ ██████ ██ █████████ ████ ██████ ███ █████ ██ ██ ███████ ████