Support It is morally praiseworthy to be honest only if one is honest out of respect for morality. ββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ βββ βββ βββ ββ β ββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββ βββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββ βββ βββ βββ βββββββββββββββββ ββββββ ββββ ββ βββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββ
The author concludes that Downing did not act in a praiseworthy manner when he told the truth about his partnerβs fraud. This is based on the following:
Downing was motivated by concern for his own well-being.
In order for it to be morally praiseworthy to be honest, it is necessary that the honesty be done out of respect for morality.
We know from the premises that if oneβs honesty is not motivated by respect for morality, one does not deserve praise for that honesty. So in theory we could conclude that Downing did not act in a way that deserves praise...as long as we know he was not motivated by respect for morality.
Another premise tells us that Downing was motivated by self-concern. Does this guarantee that he was not motivated by respect for morality? Not necessarily, since someone can have multiple motivations. To make this argument valid, then, we want to establish that if someoneβs motivation is self-concern, then they cannot also be motivated by morality.
Analysis by KevinLin
The conclusion drawn above follows βββββββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ
An action motivated ββ βββββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββββββ
Some actions that βββ βββββββββββ ββββββ βββ βββ βββββββ βββββββββββββ
An action performed βββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββ ββββ ββ ββ ββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββ
The moral praiseworthiness ββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ βββββββ
Morality demands that βββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββ βββββ βββββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββ βββ βββββββββββ
