PT154.S1.Q3 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 4 · lr

The funding of NEO research to protect Earth from asteroid collisions is not a waste of money because buying home insurance to protect your home makes good economic sense.

This statement connects the analogy of home insurance making good fiscal sense to the conclusion that government funding of NEO research is not a waste of money.

The statement connects the analogy (buying home insurance) to the conclusion that funding NEO research makes good fiscal sense.

The statement is not the overall conclusion of the argument. It does not receive any support.

The statement does not define any key terms.

The statement does not provide a contrast to the situation. It tries to make the situations more similar.

The statement is not a general principle, and the argument does not try to support it. The statement is used to support the argument’s main conclusion.

PrepTest 154 - Section 1 - Question 3

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action