Oscar: Clearly, Conclusion student evaluations provide the best assessment of teacher performance. ███ ██ ██ █ ██████ ████████ ██ █████ █ ███████ ████ ████ █████████ █████████
████████ ███████ ███████████ ██ ████████ ███ ███████ █████████ ██ ███ ███ ██ █ ██████ ████████ ████████ █████████ ████ ██ ██████████ ███ ██████ ██ █ ███████ █████ ████ █████ ██████ ███ ████ ███████████ ██ ████████ █████ ██ █ ████ ██████████ ██ █ ██████ ████████████
Oscar says that student evaluations are the best assessment of teacher performance. This is supported by the implied premise that students are in the best position to judge a teacher.
Bettina says that peer evaluations may be a good supplement or a better alternative to assess teacher performance. Why? Because students generally fail to appreciate the impact of a teacher until years later, and student evaluations are conducted right at the end of a class.
We need a statement Oscar and Bettina disagree on. They disagree on whether student evaluations are the best way to evaluate teachers. Oscar thinks that student evaluations are the best, but Bettina thinks peer evaluations could be a better alternative.
The dialogue provides the most ███████ ███ ███ █████ ████ █████ ███ ███████ ████████ ████ ███████
students are ever ███████ ██ ██████████ ███████ █ ███████████ ███████████
students’ opinions may ██████ ████ █ ██████ ██ ████ █████
student evaluations furnish ███ ███████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ███████████
teacher performance should ██ ████████ ███████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ███████████
student evaluations are ███████ █████████ ██ ███ ███ ██ █ █████