Subscription pricing
Legislator: University humanities departments bring in less tuition and grant money than science departments. ███ ███████ ████████ ███ ████████ ████ █████████████ ████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ██████████ ███████████ █████ ██ ████ █████ ████ ████ █████ █████ ███ ███████ ██ ████ ██ ███████ ████████████ ██ █ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████████████████ ████ ██████████ ███████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ████████████ ██████████ ███████████ ████████ █████████ ███████ ████████████ █████ ██ ██ █ ███████ ███ ████████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███████████ ████ ██████ ██████ ███████████
Summarize Argument
The Legislator concludes that it is a mistake for universities to cut humanities departments when facing budget shortfalls for several reasons:
Teaching and research in the humanities costs less
(Sub-conclusion) So Humanities departments bring in more money than they spend
(Sub-conclusion) So Humanities departments subsidize science departments
Identify Argument Part
The claim in the first part of the second sentence is a premise offered in support of a sub-conclusion, which is offered as support for the Legislator’s main conclusion.
17.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ████████ ███ ████████ ████ █████████████ ████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████ ██ ███ █████████
a
It is offered ██ ███████ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ██ ███████ ███████████
b
It is an ███████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███████ ███████████
c
It is put ███████ ██ █ █████████ ██ ██ ███████████ ███ █ ███████ ██ ███ █████████
d
It is an ████████████ ██████████ ████ █████ ███ ██████████ ███████ ██████████ ██ █████████
e
It is one ██ ████ ██████ ████ █████████ ██ ███████████ ███████ ███ ███ ██████████ ███████ ███████████