Essayist: Commitment to relationships or careers is commonly held to be virtuous. βββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββ ββββ βββ ββ βββββββββ ββ βββββ ββ ββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ ββ β ββββββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββββ
The author concludes that all commitments should be seen as morally neutral.
Why?
Because a commitment can either be good or bad.
Some commitments deserve no praise.
Some commitments have outlasted their original justification.
Notice that the conclusion asserts that βallβ commitments are βmorally neutral.β But the premises donβt tell us about βallβ commitment β they only tell us some random facts about some commitments.
In addition, the premises donβt tell us about what should be considered βmorally neutral.β In fact, one premise indicates that some commitment are βgoodβ or βbad.β So itβs odd for the author to conclude that βallβ commitments are morally neutral.
We want a principle that gets us from at least one of the premises to the claim that βallβ commitments are morally neutral.
Analysis by KevinLin
Which one of the following βββββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ
Any commitment that ββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββ βββββ
Commitment to a ββββββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββ βββββ
If a commitment ββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββ
If a commitment βββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββ βββββββββ
All commitments are βββββββ βββββββ ββ βββββ βββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββββ