Political arguments about biodiversity and the preservation of endangered species generally assume we know what a species is. ███ █████████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ███████████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ████ ████ █ █████████ ███ █████████████ █████████ ███
Context ·What's a "species"? Arguments about biodiversity assume we know this.
Sibley's potential response ·Acknowledges that "species concept" is slippery
However, for practical reasons, we have to limit the number of species we recognize. (If we said you were a different species from your mom, because you have slightly different DNA, that would lead to billions of different "species" in the world. That's impractical.)
Implications of debate ·How we answer the species question has political and economic consequences
Example: Increasing number of species would likely increase number of endangered species.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
22.
Which one of the following, ██ █████ █████ ███████ ███ █████████ ███████ ███ ███ ████████ █████████ ██ ███ █████ ████████ ██ ███ ███████ █████ ███ ███████ ██ ██████████ ███ ██████ ██ ██████████ ████████
Question Type
WSE
This is a Strengthen question for the author’s claim in the final sentence of the passage. In this sentence, the author claims that increasing the number of species would likely increase the number of species that need protection. We are looking for information that strengthens this claim.
a
It is becoming ████████████ █████████ ██ █████ █████████████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ██████████ ████████
(A) is about how international agreements handle things once we know that a species is endangered; the author’s claim in the final sentence is about the number of species that need protection. For the purposes of strengthening the last sentence, we care about classification, not protection. (A) is about a completely different step in the species protection process, so (A) doesn’t support the claim in the last sentence.
This comparison between bird and mammal species is not relevant to the author’s claim in the final sentence of the passage. This doesn’t support the claim that, if we have more species, then more species will need protection.
c
In disputes over ██████████ ██ ██████████ ████████ ████████ ██████████████ █████ ████████ ██████████ █████
This doesn’t tell us why increasing the number of species will probably increase the number of species that need protection. Saying that economic considerations often outweigh scientific considerations doesn’t provide the support that we need.
(D) says that advances in science will favor the efforts of the splitters, which means that we will probably have more species (because we know that the splitters want to divide similar populations into different species). However, (D) doesn’t address the effects of having more species. The author’s claim is that having more species will probably increase the number of species that need protection, so (D) doesn’t provide the support that we need. The claim that we need to support isn’t just that there will be more species. Instead, we need to support the conditional claim that if we have more species, then more species will need protection.
The last sentence of the passage claims that, if we increase the number of species, then we are increasing the number of species that need protection. We know that the splitters want to increase the number of species. But why would this increase the number of species that need protection? The author must be assuming that the splitters are going to suggest splitting endangered species.
(E) supports this assumption. (E) tells us that the splitters are more likely to contest an establish species classification (and split the species) if one of the populations involved is endangered. In other words, the splitters will be disproportionately trying to “split” endangered species, thus increasing the number of endangered species.
Difficulty
30% of people who answer get this correct
This is a very difficult question.
It is slightly harder than the average question in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%159
171
75%180
Analysis
WSE
Critique or debate
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
24%
158
b
3%
153
c
27%
157
d
16%
161
e
30%
165
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.