PT158.S1.P3.Q16 > Analytics

Hide analysis

Passage A is adapted from an essay by historian Christopher Ricks; passage B is from the introduction, by historian Paulina Kewes, to a book in which Ricks's essay appears.

███████ █

Rosenthal's Purpose · To question definition of plagiarism

Rosenthal's answer · The required postmodern answer

Postmodern answer = there's no difference between plagiarism and things that people don't think are plagiarism. It's just about power; if people in power don't like certain copying, it's plagiarism.

Rosenthal's assumption · Plagiarism doesn't involve a moral issue; it's about power

███ ███████████ ██ █ ██████████ ████████ ████ █████ ██ ██████████████ ███ ███████████ ███████ █████████ ███ ██████████ ██ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ████████ █████ ████████ ████ ██ █████ ████████ ██ █████████ ████ ███ ██ ██████ ██████ ████ █████ █████████ ███ ███████ ███ ███████████ ██ ██████ █████ ████████████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ███ ██ █████████ ██████████████ ██████ ██ ████████ ███ ███████████ ██ █████ ██████████████ ████ █████████ █████████ ████ ██ ████ ███ ██ █ ███ ████ ██ █████████ ████████

Ricks' perspective · Political history should involve moral considerations

Although there's no universal moral standard, that doesn't mean moral standards shouldn't exist. (Not sure what "political history" means, but clearly Rosenthal's book is an example of it.)

███████ █

███ ████ ██ ███████████ ████ ███ ██████ ███ █ ████████ ██ ███████ ███████████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████████ ███ ██████████ █████████ ████ █████ ██ █████████ ██████ ███ ██████ ████████ ██████ █████ ███████ █████████████ ████ ██████████ ███████ ██ ████████ ██ ██████████ ██████████████ ███ ████████ ██ ████████ █████████ ███ ████████████ ██ █████████ ██████████ ██████████ ███████████ █████████ ██ ███████████ ███████ ██ ███████ █████ ████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ██████ █████ ███ ████ ████ ████████ ██ ███ ███ ███ ██████ ███ ████ ████████ ███ █████████ █████████ ████ ██ ███████ █████████████ ████ ████ █████████ ██████████ █████████ ████████ ███ █████████ ████████

Intro topic · Plagiarism

Accusations of plagiarism in history have been very fluid, and are influenced by commercial, artistic, and legal views. Sometimes the same act has been called plagiarism and not plagiarism.

Ricks' perspective · Critical of historical approach to ethical issues

He thinks it leads to moral relativism, which he thinks is bad.

███ █████ ███ ██████████ ███████████ ███ █████ ███ ██████████ ███████████

Author's criticism · Ricks paints with too broad a brush

Some historical approaches might be good, even if others are bad.

Concession · Ricks is right to criticize some scholarship

Not all moral standards are just about power, and it can be wrong to project modern-day ideologies onto past events. Ricks is right to make these points.

Author's perspective · Ricks is too extreme

Some historical scholarship can still be good, even if there's a lot of bad scholarship out there. Recognizing different historical understandings of plagiarism doesn't imply any agreement with one or more of those understandings.

Passage Style

16.

Which one of the following ██ █ ███████ ███████ ██████ ██ ████ █████████

Question Type

Implied

Purpose of passage

We’re looking for an answer choice that describes a central purpose of both passages.

Split Approach: After passage A, eliminate any answer choices that are not a central purpose of passage A. Then, after passage B, eliminate any remaining answer choices that are not a central purpose of passage B. There will only be one answer choice that describes a central purpose of both passages.

Sequential Approach: This one is hard to predict. The passages seem to have different purposes, even though they address similar issues. We’ll have to use POE on the answer choices to determine which one describes a central purpose of both passages.

to trace the ██████████ ███████████ ██ ██ █████████ ████

This is not a purpose of passage A. Rosenthal’s book looks at the history of plagiarism in a certain era, but author A never traces the development of plagiarism throughout history. He just criticizes Rosenthal’s arguments. This is enough reason to eliminate (A). It’s also not a purpose of passage B. Author B notes that the idea of plagiarism “has a history” and has changed over time, but she doesn’t trace its development throughout history.

13%

to find fault ████ █ ███ ██ ███████████ █ █████████ █████

This describes a central purpose of both passages. The central purpose of passage A is to criticize Rosenthal’s way of approaching the historical understanding of plagiarism. A central purpose of passage B is to find fault with author A’s way of approaching his argument. She thinks that author A is too extreme in his dismissal of historical approaches, even though he’s right in some ways. She also finds fault with the postmodern approach that reduces moral standards to expressions of power.

46%

to examine shifting █████████ █████████ ██████ █ ██████████ █████

This is not a purpose of passage A. Author A only examines one scholarly attitude toward plagiarism: Rosenthal’s. He never examines any other scholarly attitudes, nor does he suggest that Rosenthal’s attitude is “shifting.” This is enough reason to eliminate (C). It’s also not a purpose of passage B. Author B says that the idea of plagiarism has shifted over time, but she doesn’t examine any scholarly attitudes toward plagiarism.

40%

to explain why █ ████ ██ ███████████ ███ ██████ ████████

This is not a purpose of passage A. We have no reason to believe that Rosenthal’s scholarship about plagiarism “has become dominant.” Even if it has, author A doesn’t try to explain why it’s dominant. This is enough reason to eliminate (D). It’s also not a purpose of passage B. Author B never discusses any type of scholarship that has become dominant.

to argue that █ ██████████ ████ ██ ██████ ███████████

This is a central purpose of passage A. Author A argues that Rosenthal’s book is deeply problematic. But this is not a central purpose of passage B. She criticizes author B’s approach, but his argument is in an essay, not in a book. She also admits that author B is right in some of his arguments, so she may not think that his argument is “deeply problematic.”

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

It takes about five minutes.

Take the free diagnostic

More free LSAT prep: Sample LSAT questions Full-length diagnostic & practice test All free LSAT resources

PrepTest 158 - Section 1 - Passage 3 - Question 16

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action

PrepTest 158 - Section 1 - Passage 3 - Question 16

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Want to know why the right answer is right?