https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-67-section-3-game-4/

I was not sure about the question sentence...it says "If three subzones in all are designated for retail use and a subzone in Z2 is designated for housing, then which one of the following is allowed?"

But zone1 cannot have R, why it says "If three subzones in all..." I thought it's just impossible...where did I misread the question sentence?

0

4 comments

  • Wednesday, Aug 17 2016

    Thanks!

    0
  • Wednesday, Aug 17 2016

    Yes

    0
  • Wednesday, Aug 17 2016

    so does this "in all" means "among all subzones"??

    0
  • Wednesday, Aug 17 2016

    It means from the total of all three subzones, you will have 3 R. However, we also know that we can't have R in z1. So, it's their sneaky way of saying 3 R in z2 and z3.

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?