3 comments

  • Wednesday, Sep 07 2016

    No problem @yoonaleeabc303

    0
  • Tuesday, Sep 06 2016

    thanks, that was immensely helpful. It's frustrating that I failed to see that real life application because I was seeing this only in terms of lawgic: ~o --> ~p and I was so sure that the contrapositive was supposed to help bridge P & O ughhh

    thanks again @torahisland910

    0
  • Monday, Sep 05 2016

    Hi @yoonaleeabc303

    Answer (A) posits that failing to do something one ought to do = failing to keep one's promise.

    This is not true and reverses the truth. Promises are a particular instance of something one ought to do. But there are many other things one ought to do that are not promises - e.g., help someone drowning... Accordingly, the reverse of (A) might be true: failing to keep one's promise = failing to do what one ought to do. (This argument presumes that one ought to keep one's promise.)

    1

Confirm action

Are you sure?